Honest comparison
Private PPO vs. health sharing plans.
Health care sharing ministries have grown fast among self-employed households, and the appeal is obvious: monthly costs well below insurance, and a community-based model that many members genuinely like.
There is one structural fact that has to sit at the front of any honest comparison, and members' own program guidelines say it plainly: a sharing ministry is not insurance, and it is not contractually obligated to pay your medical bills.
The alternative
Health sharing
A membership organization where members share one another's eligible medical costs.
Where it genuinely wins
- Monthly contributions are typically well below insurance premiums
- Members frequently report high satisfaction and a strong sense of community
- No medical underwriting in the insurance sense, though membership requirements apply
- Many programs are transparent about their sharing history
Where it costs you
- Not insurance — there is no contractual or legal obligation to pay a claim, and no state guaranty fund behind it
- Not regulated by state insurance departments, so the consumer protections that apply to insurers do not apply here
- Pre-existing conditions are usually excluded for a waiting period, sometimes permanently
- Many programs require agreement to a statement of faith or a lifestyle code
- Annual and per-incident sharing limits are common
- Members typically pay providers first and request sharing afterward
What we do
Private PPOA regulated insurance contract with a legal obligation to pay covered claims.
Where it genuinely wins
- A binding contract — covered claims must be paid
- Regulated by your state's insurance department, with a complaint process and a guaranty association
- Providers bill the carrier directly rather than you fronting the cost
- Defined network pricing and negotiated rates
- Clear appeals rights when a claim is denied
Where it costs you
- Higher monthly cost than most sharing programs
- Medically underwritten — health history can affect approval and price
- Benefit design is set by the policy, not negotiated case by case
Side by side
The differences that actually change your bill.
| Feature | Health sharing | Private PPO |
|---|---|---|
| Is it insurance? | No | Yes |
| Legal obligation to pay | None | Contractual |
| State insurance regulation | Generally exempt | Regulated |
| Guaranty fund protection | No | Yes |
| Pre-existing conditions | Waiting period or excluded | Covered on some structures |
| Who pays the provider | You, then request sharing | The carrier, directly |
| Network discounts | Varies, often none | Negotiated PPO rates |
| Appeals process | Internal to the ministry | Regulated appeals rights |
| Membership requirements | Often a faith or lifestyle statement | None |
| Monthly cost | Lower | Higher |
Is it insurance?
Health sharing
No
Private PPO
Yes
Legal obligation to pay
Health sharing
None
Private PPO
Contractual
State insurance regulation
Health sharing
Generally exempt
Private PPO
Regulated
Guaranty fund protection
Health sharing
No
Private PPO
Yes
Pre-existing conditions
Health sharing
Waiting period or excluded
Private PPO
Covered on some structures
Who pays the provider
Health sharing
You, then request sharing
Private PPO
The carrier, directly
Network discounts
Health sharing
Varies, often none
Private PPO
Negotiated PPO rates
Appeals process
Health sharing
Internal to the ministry
Private PPO
Regulated appeals rights
Membership requirements
Health sharing
Often a faith or lifestyle statement
Private PPO
None
Monthly cost
Health sharing
Lower
Private PPO
Higher
Actual premiums, deductibles, networks and benefits vary by age, location, household, health history and the plan selected.
The questions behind it
What people ask once they’ve seen the table.
If members are generally happy, does the 'not insurance' point really matter?
It matters at the tail. Most members, most years, have ordinary medical costs and their experience is fine. The distinction shows up in the rare, catastrophic case — the one you buy coverage for in the first place.
With an insurance contract, a covered claim is an obligation the carrier must meet, backed by a regulator and a state guaranty association. With a sharing ministry, a request that isn't shared leaves you holding the bill with no regulatory remedy.
How are pre-existing conditions handled?
Most programs apply a graduated waiting period — nothing shared in year one, a capped amount in year two, more in year three — and some exclude certain conditions permanently. Specifics vary a lot between programs.
If you have an active condition, read the program's guidelines on that exact condition before joining. This is where the gap between expectation and outcome is widest.
What about the cost difference?
It's real and often large. A household contribution can sit well below a comparable insurance premium, which is precisely why the model attracts self-employed families facing unsubsidized rates.
The honest framing is that you're paying less because you're carrying more of the risk yourself. That may be a rational trade for a healthy household with savings to absorb a bad year. It's a harder trade for a household that couldn't absorb one.
Can I use a sharing program and insurance together?
Some households pair a sharing program with a separate accident or critical-illness policy to backstop the largest risks. Others use sharing for routine costs while keeping a high-deductible insurance policy for catastrophic protection.
An advisor can walk through what that layering actually costs versus a single underwritten plan. Sometimes the combination is more expensive than just buying the coverage.
Health sharing is better if…
- You're healthy, have savings, and can absorb a bad year
- You're comfortable with the program's faith or lifestyle requirements
- Monthly cost is the binding constraint on your decision
- You understand and accept that sharing is not guaranteed
Private PPO is better if…
- You want a contractual, regulated obligation to pay claims
- You have a pre-existing condition that needs covering now
- You'd rather providers bill the carrier than front costs yourself
- A catastrophic year would be financially unsurvivable without coverage
The plain-language verdict
Health sharing is a legitimate choice made knowingly, and plenty of members are satisfied. It is not a cheaper version of insurance — it is a different arrangement with a different risk profile, and the difference shows up exactly when the stakes are highest. If you go that route, go in having read the guidelines on your own conditions. If you want an enforceable obligation behind your coverage, that's what an insurance contract is.
Still not sure?
Ask a licensed advisor. It's free either way.
Five short questions and a real person will tell you which of these options actually fits your household — including when the answer isn't us.
- Free, no-obligation review
- One licensed advisor — never a call center
- Your details are never sold to third parties
- Enroll any day of the year
Free coverage review
Step 1 of 5
Let’s find your coverage
Start with your state.
Your information is secure and private.
Secure & private. By submitting you agree to be contacted by one licensed advisor.